• 02Mar

    About 1,100 lawsuits claiming that Bayer’s blockbuster birth control medication has caused blood clots have been filed. This is a staggering increase from the 129 that had reportedly been filed as of last November.

    Bayer disclosed the number in its 2009 annual report. While it was no secret that Yaz lawsuits were being filed, it is apparent that the Yaz lawsuit problem is larger than Bayer had previously anticipated.

    Yaz lawsuits filed in the U.S. federal court have been consolidated into a multi-district litigation (MDL) in the Southern District of Illinois.

    In addition to the 1,100 individual lawsuits, Bayer’s annual report also discloses that company has “been served with three putative consumer class actions claiming economic loss, one of them claiming personal injuries.”

    The report also reveals that Bayer is facing two class action lawsuits in Canada.

    According to the report Bayer plans to “defend itself vigorously” against the lawsuits.

    If you or loved one have taken the prescription birth control Yaz and have suffered a blood clot or other serious injury our Yaz lawyers can help. For a free consultation with a Yaz attorney call us toll free at 866-LAW(529)-2400 or via the internet by filling out the form on this page.

    Source: bnet.com

    Tags: ,

  • 02Mar

    Vicki Parsons of Memphis recently filed suit against the pharmaceutical giant Bayer. Parsons claims that the company’s birth control medication Yaz almost caused her death three years ago. Last week she told her story to Memphis’ WREG in hopes that her story would help other women who may have been harmed as a result of taking Yaz.

    It was June of 2007 and Parsons and her husband were on vacation when she first noticed pain in her foot. Only a few days later she was rushed to the hospital where doctors found massive blood clots in her lungs and legs.

    After running extensive to determine what caused the immense clots doctors said it was caused by her birth control.

    Parsons had no previous history or family history of blood clots. She also was not a smoker which has been known to exacerbate the development of blood clots in some instances. All Vickie Parsons had done was take Bayer’s birth control medication Yaz, and she nearly lost her life because of it.

    Parsons had only been taking Yaz about three weeks when her first blood clots were discovered. She has since had more blood clots including one last year.

    Parsons joins over 1,000 other women who have filed similar lawsuits against Bayer of side effects related to the use of Yaz.

    The Yaz attorneys at Reich & Binstock are committed to helping women who have been harmed by Yaz. With years of experience in birth control litigation our clients can be assured that our Yaz lawyers will fight for them.

    If you or a loved one has taken the birth control medication Yaz and have suffered a blood clot or other serious side effect we can help. Contact us for a free consultation with a Yaz attorney.

    Tags: ,

  • 23Feb

    Bi-polar disorder or manic depression affects approximately 5.7 million American adults. It is a common misconception that bi-polar disorder is more common amongst women, but studies confirm that men and women are equally affected by the affliction. Although the number of men and women affected by manic depression are similar; treatment options may differ between genders. This is particularly important when treating bi-polar disorder in women who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant.

    Since the onset of bi-polar disorder commonly occurs in young adulthood most women diagnosed with the illness will be of child bearing age for some time. It is important for women who have been diagnosed with bi-polar disorder to carefully weigh their treatment options if they plan to become pregnant.

    Careful planning can help reduce the potential risks to both the mother and the fetus. Certain medications that are commonly used to treat bi-polar disorder have been shown to increase the risk of birth defects. These medications include Tegretol and Depakote, two anticonvulsant medications that shown to be effective at treating the symptoms of bi-polar disorder, but have also shown to cause serious birth defects like spina bifida.

    Lithium and first generation antipsychotics like Haldol are considered to be preferred mood stabilizers for pregnant women because they have consistently shown minimal risk to the fetus.

    In most cases women who are using Depakote to control their bi-polar symptoms are encouraged to switch to another mood stabilizer before conception, due to the increased risk of birth defects that has been associated with the use of Depakote during pregnancy.

    A study released in 2006 found that 20.3 percent of mother’s who took Depakote while pregnant had babies who experienced serious adverse outcomes. This staggering number has driven many expert to the opinion that Depakote should only be taken by pregnant women if it is absolutely necessary for the mother’s well being.

    One of the most serious birth defects that has been associated with the use of Depakote while pregnant is spina bifida. Spina bifida is a rare neural tube defect where some of the vertebrae overlaying the spinal cord are not fully formed and remain unfused and open.

    In the total population the risk of having a child born with spina bifida is less than 1 in 1000; however, if the fetus has been exposed to Depakote the risk of spina bifida can be as high as 2 percent.

    It is extremely important that women who plan on becoming pregnant carefully plan their pregnancy with their doctor to ensure that potential risks to the fetus are minimized.

    If you or loved one has taken Depakote during pregnancy and as a result the child has suffered a birth defect there is help. Our Depakote attorneys can help explain your legal rights and explore the ways they may be able to help. Contact us for a free consultation with a Depakote lawyer.

    Tags: , , ,

  • 22Feb

    Jennifer and Martin McElroy have filed a class action lawsuit against a lender and mortgage broker for allegedly fraudulently charging an unearned yield spread premium (YSP) fee. The lawsuit claims that the NJ-based Maverick Funding Corp. and RI-based Homeland Funding Solutions Inc. violated Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) by charging a fee that was not earned.

    The lawsuit alleges that when the McElroy’s refinanced their home through Maverick, a YSP was paid to Homeland. The plaintiffs argue that this fee was unearned under RESPA rules because no services were performed to warrant a YSP being charged.

    According to the suit despite paying a loan origination fee and a mortgage broker fee, and Maverick being paid an underwriting fee, Homeland charged YSP with no services preformed to earn the additional charge. Additionally the lawsuit alleges that the YSP was not disclosed on the HUD Settlement Statement because Homeland and Maverick conspired to split the unearned fee.

    The plaintiffs also claim that Maverick and Homeland violated the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act as well as the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.

    The plaintiffs claim the defendants acted in concert to carry out the alleged scheme to defraud homeowners by charging exorbitant, unearned, and unlawful fees.

    Plaintiffs are seeking class certification for all persons who were allegedly defrauded by the defendants during the class period.

    If found liable under RESPA the defendants may be responsible for paying class members 3 times the amount of the “unearned” fee charged to them.

    If you refinanced your home through Maverick Funding Corp. or Homeland Funding Solutions Inc. and believe that you may have been defrauded contact us today to speak with one of experienced fraud attorneys about how they can help you.

    Tags: ,

  • 12Feb

    Today the Department of Aging and Disability Services announce that they will be employing 35 new nursing home investigators. These investigators are expected to expedite the states response to reported incidents that occur at nursing homes.

    The agency says that they respond to 99 percent of the most serious complaints in less than 24 hours; however, they do admit that about a third of lower level complaints do not get a response within the required 14 response period.

    Hopefully the new employees will improve response time for those who are injured or experience other incidents at nursing home facilities.

    If one of your loved ones has suffered an injury resulting from poor care at a nursing home we can help. Please contact us today for a free consultation with one of our nursing home abuse attorneys.

  • 11Feb

    Britax Child Safety Inc. in cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and Health Canada have issued a voluntary recall of about 14,000 baby strollers because the hinge mechanism poses a laceration and fingertip amputation risk to children riding in the stroller.

    The recall involves all Britax “Blink” single umbrella strollers. The word “Blink” is printed on the metal frame on both sides of the recalled strollers. While there have been no reported incidents associated with this particular the CPSC is urging parents to stop using the strollers immediately and contact Britax to receive free hinge covers.

    The recalled strollers were sold at Buy Buy Baby and other mass merchandise stores in the U.S. and Canada and online at Amazon.com, Babiesrus.com, Target.com, and Diapers.com

    For more information of the recall or to contact Britax to receive your hinge covers visit the Britax recall website here or call toll-free at (888) 427-4829 during normal business hours.

    If you or a loved has been injured by a defective product contact the product liability lawyers at Reich & Binstock.

  • 09Feb

    For over a year now thousands of American families have been trying to figure out how to deal with tainted Chinese-made drywall in their homes. Many have filed lawsuits but have yet to see any compensation from those responsible for this dire situation. It seems to be a pass the buck mentality when it comes to who is responsible. The insurance company, blames the builder, the builder blames the manufacturer, and so on. No matter who is a t fault, the fact remains that the victims are seeing very little in the way of recourse as of thus far.

    Recently more and more families have begun to ripping the tainted drywall out of their homes, now that the CDC and the Department of Housing and Urban Development has released guidelines and thresholds that must be observed in order to validate that a home contains tainted drywall.

    While some are pulling the drywall out of the home and starting fresh, others are trying to rid their home of the toxic effects of the drywall through another method, the “blow dry” method.

    The “blow dry” approach to dealing with toxic drywall is less expensive than replacing the drywall and wiring that may be affected, but also will likely preclude those who choose the method from receiving a damage settlement. The “blow dry” method involves pumping chlorine dioxide into the home from a blower machine. According to engineer Buddy Ferguson, the dry wall is rendered safe by killing the bacteria that causes toxic gases to leech out of the drywall and cause damage to the electrical wiring and appliances in the home.

    While those who endorse the “blow dry” method claim that it is a permanent solution to the problem, there is no conclusive study that has confirmed this. In addition the “blow dry” approach may eliminate a homeowner’s ability to recover compensation for the money spent on the service.

    If you suspect that your home may contain tainted drywall the Chinese Drywall attorneys at Reich & Binstock LLP can help. Contact us today for a free case evaluation.

    Tags: ,

  • 08Feb

    A lawsuit has been filed against British Petroleum (BP) Products of North America Inc. and Pasadena Tank Corp. on behalf of eight contract workers who claim they were exposed to “extremely high levels of benzene.”

    The lawsuit claims that the men were exposed to high levels of benzene in alleged incident at BP’s Texas City refinery on Aug. 19, 2009. According to the lawsuit a damaged pipe released benzene vapor the enveloped the area the men were working in.

    According to the suit the plaintiffs quickly evacuated the area.

    The plaintiffs were rushed to the hospital where they learned that they were exposed to benzene.

    The lawsuit alleges that BP attempted to downplay the emission by minimizing the release and its effects in internal documents and documentation with authorities.

    The incident added to BP’s “long and tortured history of failure in the area of process safety management,” the suit alleges, citing the March 2005 explosions, numerous violations of state and federal safety regulations and other offenses.

  • 23Oct

    A jury in Buffalo, New York has ordered a former control valve and control packing survivor to pay $1.5 million in damages to the family of a repair man who passed away from asbestos related mesothelioma.

    Ronald Drabczyk died at the age of 70, just 9 short years after retiring from the Niagara Falls plant where he worked repairing asbestos laden control valves for over 18 years.

    The trial lasted six weeks and concluded with jury deciding that St. Louis based Fisher Controls (a division of Emerson Electric) was negligent and should be held accountable for the grave consequences brought about by the distribution of asbestos containing products. During the trial plaintiffs council established that Fisher Contraols was aware of the dangers associated with the use of asbestos as early as 1946, but failed to issue warnings of the dangers surrounding their products.

    Buffalo court officials acknowledged that the verdict handed down, which included a rare $750,000 punitive damage award, was the first time that a corporation has been held 100 percent financially responsible for a wrongful death in a New York asbestos hearing in over 20 years.

    For more information about the dangers of asbestos and asbestos-related cancers visit Asbestos Injury Site.

    Tags: ,

  • 22Oct

    Taser International has issued new warning to police agencies throughout the nation to not shoot at the suspect’s chest. The company said that striking a suspect in the chest can in extremely rare instances poses a risk of an adverse cardiac event.

    This is the first time that Taser has ever admitted that there may be any risk of cardiac arrest associated with the use of its 50,0000-volt stun gun.

    Officials from Taser were quick to point out that the bulletin does in no way state that Tasers can cause cardiac arrest, but rather advises law enforcement authorities that controversy can be avoided if officers aim for other areas of the body.

    Over the past several years the safety of Tasers has been questioned and numerous critics claim that the devices are much more dangerous than the manufacturer has lead people to believe.

    Earlier this year a 27-year-old Texas City man died from cardiac arrest after being tazed by La Marque police during an altercation. Just last week the officers involved in the incident were cleared of any wrongdoing by a Galveston County grand Jury.

    This will likely continue to be a hot topic in the years to come with strong convictions guiding each side of the issue.

« Previous Entries   

Recent Comments

  • OH MY GOODNESS THTS SICKENING I LIKETHE PIC THO,ITS MY DSK...
  • I like your post. Good stuff. Keep them coming :)…...
  • Very nice blog. I totally agree with your thoughts....
  • If you are interested in a site specific map of where Hurric...
  • Great Photo!...